Moderators: wallace044, rtn393, Irv, cru77jones
Don Che wrote:how is that duping...them old guys signed to play together...that should be enough lol
plus....they all got PAID to be there.
Koopa Troopa wrote:Why ignore peoples resumes entirely? And not only that... coming up with excuses for his terrible signing of Hill. We should be critical. How many times have the Knicks been burned by horrible GM's?
I understand that we wanna give the guy a chance, but would you have hired him after seeing his resume? Would he even been on the list of potential hires? Or even to get an interview? I dunno.
Koopa Troopa wrote:George Hill is averaging 9 3 and 2.5. Thats the real dupe. 20 million a year for back up point guard stats. For 20 mill you would expect at worst 16 and 8. This actually might be the worst signing of all time.
shakespeare wrote:George Hill acting like Perry duped him into signing with Sacramento http://nba.nbcsports.com/2017/12/11/rep ... -playoffs/
Hilarious.
What made Hill believe Sac would compete for a playoffs berth in the Western Conference without no All-NBA talent on the roster? Perry showed Hill the money and he turned around and sold his soul.
Koopa Troopa wrote:Why ignore peoples resumes entirely? And not only that... coming up with excuses for his terrible signing of Hill. We should be critical. How many times have the Knicks been burned by horrible GM's?
I understand that we wanna give the guy a chance, but would you have hired him after seeing his resume? Would he even been on the list of potential hires? Or even to get an interview? I dunno.
Koopa Troopa wrote:I like to think he worked in Indy cause George Hill wasnt much of a PG. Lance was the playmaker. In Charlotte thats Kemba, on the Clips thats Paul, on the Grizz thats Conley. The Knicks are in dire need of a playmaker, he fits the bill
Don Che wrote:I peronsally have nothing to say in regards to Perry's past...its bad lol or just underwhelming
but i i will judge the melo trade and we have done well on that deal.
in regards to Baker he will be a rotation guard moving forward...he brings too much to the game. And these days 4 mill per for a guy in your rotation and your team is .500 thats a solid deal in my eyes.
Baker is also a system player we are just lucky its our system he fits in.
Frank/Tim
Jack/Baker
will be the rotation later in the year i hope.
Koopa Troopa wrote:First of all I dont appreciate saying I only judge deals through hindsight. I wouldnt have given Hill that kind of money no matter what. I didnt know what his stats were last year or this year until I wrote that last post. Stop that. Hill was never a great starting guard in the NBA. Like said earlier by Don, he is a system player. Now I wouldnt say he was great in Indiana though. He just played his role. He isnt a star type NBA PG. And as far as his deal being only 2 years guaranteed....two years too many for that price. Thats star money. Same with Ron Baker here on a lesser level. His deal is trash.
Next I find it hard to give him any credit for the Pistons. That was over 10 years ago and more than likely Perry was just paying his dues bringing everyone coffee. The only time his name started to really be thrown out there is in his later jobs. Perry himself likes to brag about Detroit and never mentions any of his positions in other teams. Just ignores the rest of his resume.
And man why didnt the Knicks end up scooping up Lance for cheap anyway?? Oh well.
Koopa Troopa wrote:I was channeling my inner Bill Walton.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests